GET BREAKING NEWS IN YOUR BROWSER. CLICK HERE TO TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS.
A few weeks ago I wrote a guest opinion exhorting the community to abandon the overheated, divisive and personal attacks that some have utilized during this campaign. I was issuing a call for civility during and after the campaign. I thought my piece was reasonably well argued, and might even change a few minds.
I clearly did not recognize how little impact my words would have. In the past couple of days someone has been posting fliers with extraordinarily personal attacks on one of the candidates, Steve Rosenblum. He is accused of bribing police officers (what?), racism, hatred of the homeless and more. Of course, there is no evidence for any of this; facts are apparently so last century.
As I have written previously, this has nothing to do with Steve’s merits as a candidate. I believe those merits are substantial, and I support him, but if you do not, fine. Vote accordingly. That is all part of the democratic process. But targeting a candidate with baseless accusations is outrageous. Bribing police? Racism? Would it be too much to ask for even a smidgen of factual basis for these claims? Hatred of the homeless? Guess who is the only candidate who has actually built housing for the homeless? That would be Steve. No one else.
Naturally, no one has stepped forward to claim responsibility. Perpetrators of this sort of thing rarely do. They hide in the shadows and believe that winning, even in a manner that conflicts with our democratic values, justifies their behavior. I hope that you will take a different approach and judge Steve – and all candidates – on the merits of their proposals, and their actual character, not on false portrayals by small, hateful individuals. Let election day be a repudiation of their tactics.
Mark Wallach is a member of the Boulder City Council
When it comes to housing in Boulder, opposition often makes “great” the enemy of the “good.” Take the Bedrooms Are For People ballot measure (300) for example. It should surprise no one that a cadre of multimillion dollar homeowners are vocally opposed to sharing their neighborhoods with residents who must pool resources on shared housing in order to live affordably here.
Opposition, usually galvanized on the NextDoor app, has veered into intensely negative, judgmental attacks on the young, low-income families, and seniors who would benefit most from Measure 300. I’ve seen outrageous comments denigrating the intellect of young people and lamenting the “disintegration” of Boulder, and so on.
And I hear opponents — those who are already comfortably settled in Boulder — voice all-or-nothing demands that include maintaining the status quo for high housing costs, keeping “neighborhood character” intact, and means-testing every new occupant to ensure that only the most worthy are allowed to live among us.
The one thing I never hear from opponents? Solutions. Instead of “no, I don’t think that’s a good idea, but what about this?” it’s just “no.” And that, to me, is a red flag.
If we want to make actual progress on major issues we face: climate change and affordability, we must work on meaningful solutions to reduce mounting ozone levels caused by excessive driving and in-commuting. We’d invest in nondiscriminatory, affordable housing options that allow people to live where they work, and with whom they choose, because those options support our young neighbors, our senior neighbors, and our low-income neighbors.
That’s part of living up to the values we say we embrace, Boulder. Measure 300 is one move in that direction, because we need to be acting on solutions, not simply accepting “no” for every forward step. I’m voting yes on 300.
In 1874 citizens of Boulder came together to ensure that this town would be the home of the primary college of higher learning in the State. They raised private funds and lobbied to convince the Legislature to make Boulder the home of the university. These pioneers wisely supported the opportunity for motivated students from across the entire state to better their lives through advanced education. That was a promise from Boulder to the citizens of Colorado in perpetuity.
People across the country have seen that Colorado has matured into a remarkable place to call home….. progressive, open-minded and welcoming. CU has been a key ingredient to that success and to the flowering of Boulder. To continue to serve the mission of the university, to provide public education for our expanding population, it must grow.
Education is one of the most highly valued services to society. Benjamin Franklin once said, “An investment in knowledge pays the best interest.” The investment by the City of Boulder to support the annexation of CU property, so the University can expand to serve the citizens of Colorado, is the best investment not only for Boulder but for the entire State. So, if you support education and the opportunities it provides for our youth to get ahead though the acquisition of knowledge, then you must vote no on referendum 302.
I am writing to express my support of Deann Bucher for Boulder Valley School Board. I was privileged to teach with Deann for over 10 years. I saw her tirelessly support students with varying abilities, seamlessly individualizing curriculum for the needs of all her students, and energizing many students for whom school held little attraction. Not surprisingly, Deann moved to the District Level and created a Social Studies curriculum to engage the diversity of students throughout Boulder Valley. A respecter of widely varying viewpoints, Deann was often a mediator who achieved positive outcomes for those who were in disagreement. She consistently held a global and inclusive view of the perspectives held by all stakeholders in our community.
Now she seeks to bring her expertise and experience to the Boulder Valley School Board. She will prove to be an energetic champion of diversity, and a supporter of the rigorous and progressive educational approach that BVSD students require.
The challenges that Boulder Valley school District faces both short and long term are complex. I believe her leadership will be invaluable.
Walking around my quiet Boulder neighborhood, children are playing on our street and neighbors are out to chat. I love where I live and the people I live near. I’m voting for Bedrooms Are For People, ballot measure 300, in hopes that it will allow me to stay.
When I moved to Boulder one year ago without a job, even the cheapest housing options stressed me out. I’m lucky – I have a highly marketable engineering degree that helped me start work after less than a month of unemployment. Even still, the rent that I pay in one of Boulder’s “affordable” neighborhoods is pretty close to being 30% of my income, which is a common threshold for measuring housing insecurity. *https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr-edge-featd-article-081417.html
And I would love to have kids, but I’m not sure I’ll be able to have them in Boulder. Like so many other young professionals, I will have to move soon if I want to start saving up enough money to have a family. We need to protect today’s families, and also provide for tomorrow’s.
Measure 300 isn’t going to single-handedly make room in Boulder for all of us. But it might allow me and my two roommates, who are a couple but are not married, to legally sublet our third unoccupied bedroom. And if not that, at least it would let someone struggling to find a place to sleep make use of a space that is currently wasted.
Cora Wiese Moore
The article reporting on the CU referendum On pages 1A and 2A of the Oct. 22 Camera, continues to give credit to the deliberately misleading “Save South Boulder” referendum. The cleverly misleading title really only applies to areas west of Highway 36. It was created by a group of citizens who have been trying, since the 2013 flood, to block CU from ever using its property by any means they can. Too many citizens have read only the referendum title and do not know its history. Thus there will be more delays while those citizens in South Boulder east and north of Highway 36 live in constant fear of the next big flood. The referendum is a shameful attempt at continued obfuscation. The city and CU have produced a carefully thought out plan that will serve all citizens, including those threatened by flooding. This should be honored by the City Council when the opportunity arises.
Tara Winer has been a neighbor for many years and I have had the pleasure of seeing her children grow and now her grandchild. Clearly she cares deeply about leaving a better environment for her family. But with her business and organizational background she has the skill set to make a real difference. There is no finer candidate for city council in this special place called Boulder.
LEAP (Learning Enrichment and Academic Progress Program), Prop 119, sounds like a great idea: raising money for “after-school programs” through an increased cannabis tax. This is how it’s positioned by advocates. But that’s not the whole truth, and LEAP has big problems. Here are just a few, but please look into further program details yourself:
• Discrimination is inherent in LEAP. Only a subset of minority and low-income students is eligible, leaving out many deserving children, including the middle class.
• LEAP creates a whole new unelected, unaccountable bureaucracy with no foreseeable end — and it’s de-Tabored.
• Finally, evidence shows that significantly increasing tax on marijuana drives black market activity, leading to an increase in drug-related crime. We have enough of that already.
Sign up for email newsletters
Fred Smith, Realtor has been helping people buy and sell homes in Heather Garden—one of the most desirable age 55+…
Cozy Country Care offers trusted in-home assisted living care in Greeley. The qualified vocational nurses, CNAs and personal caregivers assist…
What is my favorite sandwich at Your Butcher, Frank? Po Boy? Roast Beef with Horseradish? I can’t decide! The Tuscan…
Home is where the heart is! The Patrick Dolan Team will help you find your dream home in Boulder and…
Colorado residents have seen everything when it comes to squirrel activity. They scamper, fight and snag foods from any trees…
GET BREAKING NEWS IN YOUR BROWSER. CLICK HERE TO TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS.